Dark mode could drain more battery than light mode, BBC study says

zohaibahd

Posts: 853   +18
Staff
WTF?! Conventional wisdom suggests that using dark mode on apps and websites helps conserve battery life on your devices. However, new research is challenging this belief, suggesting that dark mode may actually drain energy for most users.

The surprising findings come from the BBC's R&D team, who examined how real users interact with their devices in both dark and light modes. Participants were asked to sit in front of the BBC Sounds homepage and adjust the device brightness to a comfortable level. This process was repeated for both the light and dark mode versions of the page.

A significant majority (80 percent) of participants increased their screen brightness much higher to improve visibility in dark mode. This created a "rebound effect," leading to much higher energy consumption compared to the supposedly more wasteful light mode.

Zak Datson, a BBC R&D engineer, explained that many common sustainability tips are overly simplified and fail to consider how people actually use technology in real-world scenarios.

The findings were published in the journal Joule and are part of an ongoing BBC R&D project exploring the effectiveness of typical guidelines for creating low-energy websites and apps.

"What we need is a better understanding of what exactly causes our devices to consume energy when we spend time online," Datson said. "That's what our team is working on, so that we can make changes based on evidence that will allow us to reduce the overall footprint of digital media consumption, both here at the BBC and for the wider media industry."

Too often, the BBC team found that energy advice for developers lacks solid data to back it up. As a result, coders end up wasting effort on changes that don't truly improve sustainability. The research also examined whether making websites more responsive translated to energy efficiency gains and found that it did not.

So, if dark mode isn't the battery-saving hack it was thought to be, what should actually be done to conserve energy? The most straightforward solution is simply dimming the screen brightness. BBC's research shows that using devices at maximum brightness can double power consumption. They also recommended opting for smaller screens, such as phones and tablets, which use less energy than laptops. Another practical tip is extending the lifespan of aging devices, as each new device produced has significant environmental costs.

To be fair, the team doesn't completely dismiss dark mode's merits. Their blog acknowledges that research has shown that for certain devices, adopting darker color schemes can legitimately reduce power usage. However, this is true only under controlled conditions. The researchers' main point is that these numbers haven't been tested in real-world scenarios, where user behavior can lead to unexpected outcomes.

Masthead credit: Walling

Permalink to story:

 
This is actually a really interesting study and I'd really love to see it applied more broadly to various quacky "tips and tricks" we're fed and sort of unquestionably accept.

Personally I've only ever used dark mode because its just more comfortable to look at than vast expanses of eye searing paper white, but this is an interesting angle that I'd never considered.
 
"Increasing screen brightness increases energy usage, BBC study finds".

"Conventional wisdom says that most people who use dark modes don't GAF about energy conservation and are in fact far more concerned with their overall eye strain for long-term screen use".

"The team acknowledges that depending on the display technology and other device factors, their overly-broad claims about energy usage may actually be incorrect and misleading".

I feel this adequately fixes the primary points being made.
 
As others point out, I use dark mode because it’s less eye strain for me when I’m coding or writing documents. Oh, and apparently contrary to the study, I’m usually at 15% brightness whether I’m in dark mode or not. I would likely get a headache after an hour at anything more than 50%.
 
Good to know. That's crazy. Their poor eyes! Lost battery life I can live with to save mine. Thankfully I'm part of the 20%. I keep my brightness in dark mode low enough you won't even see any blooming. My brightness only adjusts on its own if it detects direct sunlight.
 
Well, if you have LED screen, which everyone does by now, total black means those pixels are turned off, correct me if I am wrong. That being said, many of these "dark modes" are not completely black, but dark grey or dark blue and they don't turn those pixels off to save battery life.
 
Jesus christ this is simple. plug in wattometer, record loading the same pages with NO ADS on static web sites on a local server, pause for x seconds per page in each mode. compare. done.


how do these people have jobs .....
 
BBC and studies, give me a break, LMAO.

As someone said here, we USE DARK MODE for less eye strain, nobody cares about battery, altough, I and I bet others too, dont actually INCREASE brightness if they use a dark mode website or app.
 
I use dark mode only because it's better for my eyes.

Does anyone really use dark mode to save power? I truly doubt.
This obsession with "sustainability" really pisses me off.
Now someone may conduct an even more ridiculous "study" to examine the "carbon footprint" of dark mode.

 
Dark mode could get around this with modify fonts given pixel density on newer phones - ie making font 50% more thic, but not fat
 
As others point out, I use dark mode because it’s less eye strain for me when I’m coding or writing documents. Oh, and apparently contrary to the study, I’m usually at 15% brightness whether I’m in dark mode or not. I would likely get a headache after an hour at anything more than 50%.
It depends on your eyes, really. Around half of the population can see better in dark mode, for the other half it's the opposite. I'm in the latter gang. Reading stuff in dark mode makes my eyes bleed.
 
They also recommended opting for smaller screens, such as phones and tablets, which use less energy than laptops.
Yeah for just mindlessly reading. If I need to search for something or get something done I do it so much faster on the PC it offsets it.

Also there's different screen types. On TN panels white uses less power than black. On IPS and oled its the opposite.
Most dark themes use grays rather than black. Only black turns the pixel on an (AM)O-led screen off for some real power savings.
This experiment also skews the result by letting the user adjust the brightness. That's something I for one don't do per app or site.

Anyways like others have said most users use dark mode because it's less straining on the eyes. Being flashbanged by a bright white site is indeed a good way to get people to turn their brightness down. It's however also a good way to get people not to use your site. I've found alternatives for some apps and sites simply because they they didn't offer a dark mode.
Imo the best way to do it is like techspot does, offer both and let the user choose.
 
This isn’t true for me, I use a lower brightness in dark mode. I’d be curious how they actually tested this. Was the ambient lighting bright? I would assume most testing was done during the day? Of course if the ambient lighting is high and dark mode is enabled you’d increase the brightness.
 
They did their research only using an LCD screen. Dark mode on LCD may lower power usage if the system automatically lowers the backlight brightness to keep the dark parts dark. But that also lowers the brightness for non-dark parts, so users may compensate by increasing the backlight brightness and thus invalidate any power savings.

Dark mode is ideal for OLED screens, where the perfectly black (not just dark) parts of the screen are actually turned off.
 
This doesn't matter to me. Dark mode is easier on the eyes and often looks better. It's preferred. I don't care if it uses more energy.
 
I don't think this research was complete. I don't change the brightness when I switch to dark mode. However, I don't think they looked at useage which might increase when using dark mode. Also, I can't image a screen at 75% brightness showing mostly white would use significantly less power than a dark mode screen showing mostly black at 100% brightness.
 
Ok, the BBC just wanted to remind their readers that they should be obsessed about global warming (or any fear stimulating issue) and have them constantly switching from one habit to another to guarantee a complete obedience, no matter if it's real or not.
 
Also, I can't image a screen at 75% brightness showing mostly white would use significantly less power than a dark mode screen showing mostly black at 100% brightness.
That's because you don't understand how some displays work. With non-led type displays(TN, VA, IPS), the back light is always on and when dark images are displayed the light is being blocked by the pixel elements. So in that situation, yes 100% brightness uses more power than 75%. In the case of LED(OLED, QDLED, etc) based displays, even those the pixel elements dim or turn off for darker images, the power requirement different for 100% brightness VS 75% is not 25%. It takes about 60% more power for an LED display element to shine at 100% than at 75%. So in that situation more power is potentially used at 100% brightness over 75%.

However there is another aspect to consider. Overall amount of power being used. In the case of TV's, PC monitors and laptop panels where the wattage used is mostly(and often greatly) less than 100w, the differences in brightness are so insignificant that it's just not worth of consideration. For mobile device the electricity used in a normal device charge cycle, the difference is even more insignificant.

So while your technical understanding of how panels work may have missed the mark, your opinion that the BBC missed a few things(likely deliberately) does not. They missing big-picture context.

Ok, the BBC just wanted to remind their readers that they should be obsessed about global warming (or any fear stimulating issue) and have them constantly switching from one habit to another to guarantee a complete obedience, no matter if it's real or not.
Or it's their continued effort to march head-long into the goose-stepping type of mentality of the last century. The British have failed to learn the lessons taught by recent history. It's more than just a little saddening.
 
Last edited:
I think they forgot to mention that it only holds true (maybe) for IPS and like screens. For AMOLED every pixel uses power independently so white text on black will use 1/10 or about power. So they should not generalize or else state clearly that the study is limited to certain displays.
 
I kinda don't get it. When I look at websites with white background and then switch to visual studio with dark mode applied, I don't adjust my screen's brightness. I see everything perfectly fine
I think this study applies more to mobile devices that are perhaps used outside or high ambient light environments.

OLED does this, not LED. LED displays use a black light.
I think you meant to say backlight, not black light.

In case of LED the whole display is constantly powered on - even when displaying pure black. Tho I would assume there should be some energy savings vs white mode unless the user manually increases brightness in dark mode.
Unless the LED has some local dimming capabilities but even these are usually limited to ~1100 zones on desktop monitors.
 
Back