Apple spies on workers while championing user privacy, lawsuit alleges

nanoguy

Posts: 1,365   +27
Staff member
The big picture: Apple has long been a strong proponent of privacy as a fundamental human right, which is reflected in services like Apple Intelligence and Private Relay. However, one Apple employee claims that none of the company's privacy protections extend to its workforce and is now taking the matter to court.

Apple is facing a new lawsuit alleging that the company has been spying on its employees by monitoring their activities on personal devices and iCloud accounts. According to Semafor, the suit was filed on Sunday in a California state court by Apple employee Amar Bhakta. He claims that Apple routinely engages in "physical, video, and electronic surveillance" of employees working from home and that this invasive monitoring continues even after individuals leave the company.

Bhakta, who has been working on Apple's advertising technologies since 2020 and leads a team of seven professionals, further alleges that Apple has weaponized its privacy policies in ways that violate California law. For instance, he claims that Apple tried to silence him when he spoke publicly about digital advertising and even forced him to edit his LinkedIn profile to remove details about his role at the company.

This isn't the first time Apple has faced accusations of spying on its employees' devices. According to the lawsuit, Apple provides company-issued hardware and work-only iCloud accounts but actively discourages employees from using them. Instead, the company promotes setting up work devices with personal accounts, which could give Apple access to non-work activities.

That said, several factors suggest the case might not hold up under close scrutiny. For one, Bhakta could have safeguarded his privacy by using a work-only iCloud account. Additionally, there's no concrete evidence that Apple is interested in monitoring employees' personal lives. It's also possible that the information Bhakta shared on LinkedIn included details Apple considers trade secrets or misrepresentations of internal company matters.

Interestingly, Bhakta is represented by Jahan Saga of Outer & Golden and Chris Baker of Baker Dolinko & Schwartz, both seasoned attorneys specializing in cases against companies accused of mistreating employees. Notably, Baker represented Susan Fowler in her high-profile case against Uber involving sexual harassment and discrimination under former CEO Travis Kalanick.

Image credit: Niels Epting

Permalink to story:

 
While you are on the job. There is no expectancy of privacy. Anything you say or do, is on company time. Always believe everything you do is being monitored and you will never have a problem.
 
Apple preaches privacy for its customers...they say nothing about employees. Its like the Military... you are not a civilian...you forfeit those rights when you sign up.


Apple make shedloads on controlling the selling of adverts to you from 3rd parties , sure as little green kittens that have a profile on you.
When Apple said it was protecting you from google , what they meant to say, is we want that revenue stream ourselves

I bet if you look at their privacy policy it will have lots of not obvious get outs ie advertiser won't know your name etc, but you were sold as package with many others

Big corporations have long memories on their vassals. Eg people trying to delete farcebook , or open a new account of FB and it already knows a lot about you, from your contacts and other methods

Most consumers/humans seem to have short memories given how many times they get scammed by corporation , political parties etc

Look over there shiny shiny
Most people too apathetic to break from a bad bank etc , too much hassle

Least with Google - they are openly saying we collect data on you and sell it
 
Apple make shedloads on controlling the selling of adverts to you from 3rd parties , sure as little green kittens that have a profile on you.
When Apple said it was protecting you from google , what they meant to say, is we want that revenue stream ourselves

I bet if you look at their privacy policy it will have lots of not obvious get outs ie advertiser won't know your name etc, but you were sold as package with many others

Big corporations have long memories on their vassals. Eg people trying to delete farcebook , or open a new account of FB and it already knows a lot about you, from your contacts and other methods

Most consumers/humans seem to have short memories given how many times they get scammed by corporation , political parties etc

Look over there shiny shiny
Most people too apathetic to break from a bad bank etc , too much hassle

Least with Google - they are openly saying we collect data on you and sell it
My favorite is when people buy apple for "privacy" then immediately put facebook on it.

Only difference between apple and google is "allegedly" apple obfuscates your name on data sold. But google allegedly does the same thing. So meh.
 
Back